Teacher Education CAEP Annual Reporting Measures
Last updated April 2026.
Measure 1. Completer Effectiveness and Impact on P-12 Student Learning
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ works with completers and local school districts to retrieve completer effectiveness data. The state also uses the Danielson Observation Framework to measure teaching effectiveness in the classroom.
Those who employ our completers at the initial level felt very positively about their preparation. 96% reported that completers were fully or moderately ready to meet the needs of their school. At focus groups, most participants reported feeling very confident in the abilities of ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ teacher education program completers to have a positive impact on P-12 learners.
2024-2025 Employer Survey Data
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ teacher education surveys beginning teachers in their first and second year of teaching to determine their sense of effectiveness and their impact on P-12 learners. Initial program completers reported confidence in their preparation. The average response across all preparations areas was that they felt prepared to work with students based on their program preparation.
2024-2025 Beginning Teacher Survey Data
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ teacher education also conducts a case study of completers to further gauge the effectiveness and impact of the program and its graduates. Participants share their Danielson observation results, student learning objective process outcomes and take part in a focus group discussion about their feelings of effectiveness and preparation.
2024-2025 Completer Case Study
Measure 2. Satisfaction of Employers and Stakeholder Involvement
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ is focused on collecting credible, actionable evidence so that our program can grow through feedback and connection with stakeholders. We do a focus group with administrators each fall and spring to talk about our teacher candidates they have worked with. We also complete an employer survey each academic year with those who employ our completers.
2024-2025 Employer Survey Data
For advanced programs, we conduct a focus group with principals and superintendents to discuss our principal preparation. This group meets fall and spring to help improve our curriculum and field experiences.
Measure 3. Candidate Competency at Completion
Title II Section 207 of the Higher Education Act requires states, as recipients of Higher Education Act funds and all institutions with teacher preparation programs that enroll students receiving federal financial assistance, to prepare annual reports on teacher preparation and licensing. These reports, available for traditional and alternative programs resulting in initial licensure, detail the enrollment and completion of our candidates.
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ graduates exceed the mean scores required for their licensure exams across program areas and are required to maintain a 2.7 GPA in teacher education and content coursework. These scores are reflected in the above Title II report.
ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ graduates in initial licensure programs complete a capstone assignment, which has them provide artifacts of evidence of growth in InTASC standards that are aligned with program goals, National Association for the Education of Young Children, Council for Exceptional Children, International Society for Technology in Education and Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation K-6 standards.
Completer Rates
Program Completers
| Area of Study | 2022-2023 | 2023-2024 | 2024-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural education | 11 | 13 | 10 |
| Art | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| Biology | 3 | 9 | 2 |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Early childhood education | 32 | 32 | 22 |
| Educational administration (graduate) | 11 | 5 | 7 |
| Elementary education | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| English | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Family and consumer sciences education | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| History | 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Physics | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Math | 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Music | 11 | 10 | 14 |
| Sociology | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Special education | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Speech | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Psychology | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Physical education | 14 | 12 | 5 |
| World languages | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Licensing Pass Rates (Title II Data)
Licensure/Certification Rate
Praxis Pass Rates – Undergraduate
| Year | ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ Number Taking Assessment | ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ Number Passing Assessment | ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ Institutional Pass Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completers 2024-2025 | 88 | 79 | 90% |
Educational Leadership Completer Feedback
*Not all graduates responded to the questions. The numbers in parentheses refer to comments made by more than one graduate.
- "It allowed me to continue an in-depth study of educational leadership theory while exploring my own educational convictions and growth advancement."
- "Background knowledge and theoretical underpinnings."
- "Cohort of peers to exchange ideas." (two)
- "Continued support after the program ended."
- "I have a better understanding of my clients who come into my business."
- "It inundated me with theories and practices of leadership techniques that enabled me to be better prepared for working with staff, community and peers."
- "Working with curriculum and instruction, different cultures and backgrounds in the classroom, administering programs and working with administrators." (three)
- "I took a position in Colorado and did very well. I believe the professors at ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ prepared me for almost any difficult situation. They were all knowing as they brought much to the table in experience. I would like some day to return to ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ as a professor of education. I would like to share my experiences as an administrator with young educators."
- "As a classroom teacher, I use a great deal of the knowledge I have attained. I have not made the decision to leave my classroom yet, but feel I am prepared when the day arrives."
- "I feel prepared in terms of the 'big picture,' communication skills, creating a positive school culture, implementing curriculum and leadership skills."
- "I feel that I am best prepared to handle school law and to handle my philosophy of education. ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ helped shape me into a more global thinker when it comes to student learning and mastery of content."
- "Wonderful collegiality with professors and peers."
- "Good texts chosen."
- "Internet classes valuable."
- "School Law and the role of the principal were both covered well." (two)
- "One of the biggest benefits was learning about leadership styles and situational leadership. It has helped me in working with my coaches and also helped me assist my coaches as they work with their student athletes."
- "Group dynamics."
- "Gave me an awareness of my own leadership style."
- "Gave me a wide variety of curriculum experiences that have been helpful since I have been in this position."
- "The past experiences of professors as school administrators were invaluable in discussions." (two)
- "My supervising professor and supervisor for my internship equipped me with the knowledge and confidence I needed."
- "I feel that I am well prepared in a variety of areas, including current practices/research, curriculum, supervision and communication."
- "Leadership skills and theories."
- "Communication skills. Response to change/handling conflict."
Measure 4. Ability of Completers to Be Hired in the Area of Licensure
Career Placement – Employment Rate
Teacher Education – Initial Preparation
| Employment Status | 2022-2023 | 2023-2024 | 2024-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employed in Field | 100 (89%) | 87 (83%) | 80 (89%) |
| Not Employed in Field | 1 (1%) | 9 (8%) | 3 (3%) |
| Unable to Track | 12 (11%) | 9 (8%) | 7 (8%) |
Educational Administration – Advanced Program
| Employment Status | 2022-2023 | 2023-2024 | 2024-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employed as Administrator after Graduation | 16/17 (93%) | 5/5 (100%) | 5/7 (71%) |
The employment data collected on our gradates shows that a large majority of them find gainful employment directly after graduation. In terms of our undergraduate completers, we have been able to track their employment both in and outside of the state of South Dakota. In terms of our graduate program, we currently rely on data from the South Dakota Board of Regents, which only tracks graduates who find employment within the state and through alumni surveys. Although this limits the reach of our data, the data that we do have is encouraging showing that a majority of our graduate program completers are able to find employment.
Undergraduate
- Early childhood education
- Agricultural education
- Family and consumer sciences education
- Foreign languages (French, German, Spanish)
- Psychology
- Sociology
- History
- Math
- Chemistry
- Physics
- Communication studies – speech
- Biology
- English
- Art
Graduate
- Educational administration (graduate)
Nationally Accredited Programs
- School counseling (graduate) – Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs
- Music education – National Association of Schools of Music
Nationally Recognized Programs
- Physical education (Society of Health and Physical Educators)
The Teacher Education Program at ÈÕ±¾avÊÓÆµ is hosting an accreditation visit by the on Sept. 9-11, 2026. Interested parties are invited to submit third-party comments to the team. Please note that comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered and should specify the party’s relationship to the provider (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates).
We invite you to submit written testimony to:
CAEP
1140 19th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
Or by email to: callforcomments@caepnet.org
Such comments must be within the specified period and based on the core tenets of CAEP accreditation of excellence, which recognize that:
- In CAEP’s performance-based system, accreditation is based on that demonstrates that teacher candidates know the subject matter and can teach it effectively so that students learn. In the CAEP system, EPPs must prove that candidates can connect theory to practice and be effective in an actual PreK-12 classroom.
- A professional education provider that is by CAEP is expected to be involved in ongoing planning and evaluation, engaged in continuous and development, ensure that faculty and programs reflect new knowledge, practice and technologies, and be involved in continuous development in response to the evolving world of education and educational reform.
- Comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered and should specify the respondent’s relationship, if any, to the institution (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates). Copies of all correspondence received will be sent to the university for comment prior to the review.